TERRORISTS
(know your
enemy)
EPIDEMOLOGY PATHOLOGY TREATMENT VACCINES REFERENCES
EDITORIALS NEWS
ARTICLES SAFETY PROCEEDURES
APWU Safety Hotline message
(1-888-529-1029)
| Bush, Where Are You? October 26, 2001 George Bush U.S. President 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20500 Sent by fax to 202-456-2461 RE: Anthrax Suggestions Dear President Bush, This is to express my great concern about your lack of action, and slowness of action, in your primary duty of protecting the citizens of our country. Today, you declared that two postal workers who died recently of anthrax infection had died in the line of duty, in the war against terrorism. Based on your continued lack of action, it seems you are treating postal workers as acceptable civilian casualties. We postal workers are on the front line in this war, and our defense is being left to postal managers. We are being attacked by the enemy, and you are not defending us. If the enemy was shooting at post offices, we would not expect to be defended by our postal managers. We would expect our commander-in-chief to be in charge of our defense. The same logic applies to these anthrax attacks. You are not doing nearly enough. Our defense should not be left to the Postmaster General. He does not have the power, means, money, expertise, or equipment to defend us. The United States President does. Here are some specific suggestions to win this war. The war is winnable, if the commander-in-chief will take the necessary action. 1. Immediate random testing of all postal facilities for anthrax. Testing firms are inundated with requests and postal facilities are having a hard time obtaining them. Postal facilities should get priority service from these firms. It should be obvious by now that a letter that has been next to a letter with anthrax could easily have been contaminated. Both Nightline and CNN have televised tests, in which they put baby powder in a totally sealed envelope and tapped it lightly, and the powder sprayed all over. Also, equipment (hampers, trays, etc.) from known contaminated facilities (Brentwood, Trenton) has been sent out all over the country, and then sent out again. The bags and filters from the vacuum cleaners used to clean machines can be used for these tests. A disposal procedure for these filters and bags must be implemented. 2. Much speedier implementation of sanitization/irradiation machines. 1-2 years, or 18 months, is what Ive heard from the Postmaster General. You can make this a priority and have these machines much sooner. The public health, and defense of U.S. citizens is the issue, and is the #1 priority. The mail to any person can be contaminated as explained in (1) above. 3. Biological agent detectors. I read in the newspaper that a firm has already developed these detectors, which can operate similar to smoke detectors, and the military has been using them. Today it was announced that they are being used at the Pentagon. Why arent they in postal facilities??? We are at the front line. This is like giving rifles, and bullet-proof vests, to the generals behind the lines, but not giving them to the soldiers on the front line. What possible military sense does this make????? This should be done immediately, today, if not sooner. 4. Advanced medical research. Ive also read that there have been recent big developments in medication for inhalation anthrax. Again, this should be a #1 priority of President Bush. The commander-in-chief has the means, power, manpower, authority, money, etc., to get these new medications developed and manufactured, much faster than the Postmaster General. I emphasize again, that this war is winnable. However, it will not be won if the cited lack of action and slowness of action continues. And it will not be won if the Postmaster General is left in charge of the national defense. I would very much appreciate a prompt answer to my letter. Sincerely, Stanley F. Slupik <nwialapwu@hotmail.com> Northwest Illinois Area Local President |
| President RATS IN THE HOUSE! President Bush, youve got rats in the house. Clean it up, sweep it out, George. If you continue to listen to the likes of congressmen Dick Armey and Tom Delay, the next thing well see is your return to ground zero in New York and you will be handing out shiny dimes to the children of our fallen union brothers and sisters and all other working people. Oh, the party of Lincoln, it sure has changed. Lincoln once said: If a man tells you he love America, yet hates labor; he is a liar: If a man tells you he trusts America, yet fears labor he is a fool. There is no America without labor; and to fleece one is to rob the other. Its bad enough that the workers took the brunt of the attack on September 11th; do we really need to attack their unions too? Lets not forget what this war is all about, our freedom. Our hidden enemies whether they are foreign or domestic, despise our freedom. Why should you, President Bush, listen to your highly conservative counterparts in the house attack one of the most precious freedoms workers have in this country- the freedom to organize and bargain collectively in the workplace? Its easy to lament the battles the unions have fought over this nations history. At least when the Rockefellers were hiring thugs to beat the crap out of us, we knew who the enemy was. Now we have our Texas congressmen attacking us with a fountain pen, and the next thing we know these rats are on national television telling us our airports are safe with minimum wage workers.Your spokesperson, Ari Fleicsher stated we must not federalize the security of our airports because, after all, the workers cannot be fired. Let me remind Mr. Fleicsher, who probably has never hit a time clock, that unions are not opposed to firing people. We just ask that the employer have just cause. As a postal union president for over ten years many postal employees get fired in less time (one day) than it would take to fire Mr. Fleisher, who obviously has a job for three more years. When you as our President echoed your spokesperson during your most recent radio address, as an American citizen, there was disappoint- ment. Many Americans, including myself, have refrained from criticizing you. Its a time for solidarity; its time to let you do what you were elected to do, lead this country. But as we talk daily about our security at the airports and in our postal facilities, privatization is nothing more than a buzzword to cut labor costs. At $2.50 per airline ticket to cover the cost of airline security, how much will the worker see? Instead of paying minimal wages, will we get a workforce that can earn a living wage? Will they have health benefits that will allow them to remain gainfully employed and not looking for another job every month? As with most privatization schemes, the money and benefits will never reach the workers.Oh yes, the Union, the mighty, mighty Union. As our numbers decline, as many conservatives are wont to tell us, why are you so afraid of 30,000 more dues paying members? You and your republican counterparts dont object to us paying our house and car payments with union wages or putting our kids through college with wages we have negotiated at the bargaining table. Perhaps it is because we are vocal, perhaps we cry about safety when our workers are exposed to unsafe working conditions, (like Anthrax) while our employer is without a clue as to how to provide a safe working environment for their employees. The blame is not with the postal
service, or the airlines. They dont know anymore
about terrorists and anthrax than our mothers do. The
blame should lie with those that are evil enough to kill
our citizens in ways that no one should ever imagine. But
when the pilot and flight attendants unions speak,
you are not listening. When the American postal workers
union speaks, you and the rats are not listening. Our
workplaces are not safe, yet we come to work and do our
jobs, just like you have asked us to do. We are at war,
and we need to do our part, we ask that you display that
compassionate conservatism now. The
government is in charge of our safety and we ask that you
do your jobs too. When you went down to ground zero in
New York, you dared not speak about privatizing the
firefighters or the police or talking about the ability
to hire and fire these union workers. Its
outrageous that you should do so now. Tell your Rat
friends Delay and Armey to get down to the nearest post
office and breathe the air. Our work goes beyond our jobs
and beyond our fallen brothers and sisters, we will
continue to fight to raise wages, shorten hours and
provide benefits, and ensure a safe workplace. This is
what we do, bring justice to the workroom floor, and we
are not ashamed of it. You can tell Congressmen Delay and
Armey to keep their shiny dimes, maybe next election day,
well have the right to fire them (at will), and
they will be unemployed. |
| Morgan
crisis Burrus' first test of leadership: Let's get a couple things
straight, right from the start. It's not heroic or brave
for a postal worker to walk into a building known to be
contaminated with anthrax. It's stupid. Dan Sullivan <apwuflash@aol.com> |
| NEWS ARTICLES |
| November 1, 2001: The
New York Times Union Chief's Battle is With the Postal
Service: William
M. Smith, president of the New York Metro Area Postal
Union, squints hard behind his aviator glasses and
confirms that disgruntled is just the half of what he's
feeling these days. George W. Bush is not, he huffs, the
only president at war with "evildoers." Middle-aged but hanging tough to a middle linebacker's frame that took him as far as semipro ball with the Philadelphia Bulldogs before the draft got him in 1968, Mr. Smith, a bearded brimstone Baptist, Sunday deacon and ex-Carolina farmhand, suspects he has a sort of jihad on his hands. His enemy? Make that enemies. First, the United States Postal Service: Mr. Smith, 57, is suing his perennial foe, alleging that it is undermining the safety of its city employees. Also the United States government, and now those wishy- washy physicians at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. "They've changed their tune 50 times," he complains of their much- revised anthrax policy. Rain, snow, heat, gloom: Mr. Smith's constituency of 10,000 workers is sworn to slog through them all, but nobody ever mentioned anything about weathering anthrax. Ask him if he thinks the postmaster general, John E. Potter, has any kind of handle on making the mails safe for messengers and recipients and his scowl becomes a smirk. "He's one confused man. He doesn't know an apple from an orange." Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani, the city's post- disaster guardian angel, has let Mr. Smith down, too. "He's on the side of the Postal Service!" he hollers. It is apparent that if you're not with President Smith, you're against him. Sounds familiar. He doesn't mean to yell, yet wishes his interviewer would: in the heat of "the big battlefield" with the Postal Service, he hasn't had time to get new batteries for his hearing aid. (Both eardrums were punctured in Vietnam.) He hasn't had time to get to his doctor to have his sugar diabetes checked, or to take an anthrax test, either. He can't be in two places at once, and suing the government in federal court this week to shut down the contaminated Morgan Station, where four sorting machines tested positive for anthrax last week, takes precedence. Nor has he had time to open the mail in his studiedly impersonal office at 350 West 31st Street bare walls, zero memorabilia, a banquet-sized desk completely covered by neatly stacked paperwork. Hence the postal pileup on a circular table where two union workers wearing see-through blue gloves are attempting to reduce the clutter. Some is pressing business, some not. There's even "junk mail" (his description) addressed to his predecessor, Josie McMillan, ousted by Mr. Smith in 1999 after a challenge that began in 1997 and went to court in 1998. Mr. Smith sold the last of his family property in Scotland Neck, N.C., to come up with the $13,000 required to finance his campaign. After running on an anti- fat-cat, anti-establishment platform, the first thing he did was cut the presidential salary from $142,000 to $95,000. "The president of the union is nothing but a servant," asserts Mr. Smith, a postal worker since 1976. (He was in maintenance, never a mail carrier.) "I made $47,000 when I was on the work floor, and if I can't live off $95,000, then I need to starve." MORNINGS he hauls himself out of bed in pitch blackness in Linden, N.J., where he lives with his wife, Barbara, catches the 4:36, clocks in by 5:15, runs a quick broom across the employees' lounge if he spies any crumbs (he's a neatnik), then puts on protective gloves and a surgical mask before getting a jump on his correspondence. That last bit is a recent addition to his routine. "I don't take chances," he deadpans. "The Postal Service might send some anthrax to me, the way they hate my guts." Even before the machines at Morgan tested positive for anthrax spores, Mr. Smith demanded that the station be shut down. He has advised Morgan's 5,500 workers not to report until their building is certified anthrax-free and scoffed at the Postal Service's offer to supply 7,000 employees with antibiotics without first testing them for anthrax exposure. So far, there have been no reports of a Morgan employee testing positive. He claims the economics of keeping open a station that moves 12 million pieces of mail daily is taking precedence over human lives. "I realize that Morgan employees are not Supreme Court justices or senators or Congress, but they are God's children; they have the same right to life as the a-ris-to-crats," he says, each syllable a mini-indictment. "No one piece of mail is worth a human life." Mr. Smith grew up poor in rural North Carolina, where his grandparents owned the family farm and his father hired out as a sharecropper. There was always more work than money. He hoed the fields at age 6, and by 12 tended the livestock, hogs and cattle; he remembers winning blue ribbons at the local 4-H fairs with his cows. His mother was a disciplinarian who thumped more than just her Bible. "Spare the rod, spoil the child; she believed that," he says. After high school, he followed his older brothers to New Jersey, stoked the furnaces in a refinery, played football whenever and wherever. He was closing in on a pro tryout when the Army sent him to Vietnam. Injured three times, he came home after nine months with scars and a medical discharge. He joined the postal system in Jersey City at the behest of the Veterans Administration; he recalls it as a "take the job or lose your benefits proposition." He took it. |
| November 1, 2001: WASHINGTON (AP) Burrus: Postal Service seeking unfair wage freeze: The new president of the nation's largest postal union is accusing the Postal Service of using the anthrax attacks to improve its bottom line by trying to freeze pay and cut benefits. William Burrus, president-elect of the American Postal Workers Union, said Wednesday that the Postal Service was guilty of "institutional hypocrisy." The Postal Service, he said, claims to be concerned about the health and safety of workers, yet is seeking a wage freeze and cuts in health benefits in contract arbitration hearings with the union. A message left at the Postal Service's press office was not immediately returned Wednesday. |
| November 1, 2001: INDIANAPOLIS (AP) Anthrax found on postal equipment in Indianapolis: Trace amounts of anthrax spores were found on a piece of postal equipment sent to an Indiana postal maintenance facility from a contaminated mail processing center in Washington. Gov. Frank O'Bannon said Wednesday afternoon that one positive test for a few anthrax spores had been found after 44 tests on equipment that had been sent to the Critical Parts Center for cleaning and repairs. This is the first sign of anthrax contamination found outside the Eastern Seaboard. The potential for anthrax exposure from the equipment was very limited, O'Bannon said. Wilson said state officials were not notified until Oct. 24 - a day after the Indianapolis facility was closed as a precaution - of the possibility that contaminated equipment may have been sent there. |
| November 1, 2001: The
Washington Post Flu Shot Won't Help in
Diagnosing Anthrax: Taking a flu shot will not help people tell if
they have anthrax, health officials said yesterday, as
medical groups sought to prevent anthrax fears from
causing a run on influenza vaccine. Doctors reported that many people are asking for flu vaccine in the mistaken belief that if they develop flu-like symptoms after they have been vaccinated, they will know they have anthrax. The early symptoms of anthrax resemble the flu. In reality, experts said, taking a flu shot will not help diagnose anthrax, because numerous viruses cause flu-like symptoms. "We want to separate the idea that getting vaccinated [for flu] increases or decreases your fears about getting anthrax," said Keiji Fukuda, an epidemiologist at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. "When people get vaccinated against influenza they have decreased their chances of getting the flu, but they can get infected by cold viruses." |
| November 1, 2001: The
Washington Post 'Learning
as We Go Along' Doctors Must Rewrite Book on
Anthrax ..Already, the nine cases have yielded valuable lessons. Treatment involving a combination of three antibiotics appears to help contain the infection, doctors said, and a CAT scan of the chest has been the test most likely to help clinch the diagnosis. Above all, doctors familiar with the cases emphasized that physicians who suspect that a person might have inhalational anthrax should do blood cultures and start intravenous treatment with the appropriate antibiotics immediately. "Once you suspect anthrax, you have no time to think," said Carlos Omenaca, a Miami specialist who treated Ernesto Blanco in Florida, the second case. "You first treat and then think." Four of nine people with the disease have died. Some, such as Joseph P. Curseen of Maryland and Kathy T. Nguyen of New York, died within a few days of becoming ill, while Blanco, at 73 the oldest patient, was sick for a week before seeking treatment, yet is the only one who has gone home from the hospital. (Dr. Susan) Matcha's two patients -- Leroy Richmond of Stafford County and a second worker, both from the District's Brentwood postal facility -- remain in serious but stable condition at Inova Fairfax Hospital. Neither has suffered the catastrophic, downhill course described in medical articles about the disease. Both are able to eat, to breathe on their own and to talk with their families, said Susan Whyte Simon, a Kaiser spokeswoman. Early symptoms in recent cases have not always matched the "flu-like" picture of fever, muscle aches, headache, cough and chest discomfort. The State Department mail handler being treated at Winchester Medical Center came to the emergency room with a fever, nausea and muscle aches but no cough or breathing difficulty, said Terry Sinclair, the hospital's medical director. He was initially sent home on a regimen of ciprofloxacin pills. When an alert laboratory technician spotted anthrax bacteria on a microscope slide of the man's blood, the patient was admitted to the hospital and given intravenous antibiotics. One of Matcha's cases, the second worker from the District's Brentwood postal facility, had a fever and a terrible four-day headache. Fearing meningitis, Kaiser staff sent him to Inova Fairfax Hospital for a spinal tap. That test yielded a normal finding -- but X-rays revealed telltale enlarged lymph nodes in his chest, as well as pneumonia. Blanco, the Florida patient, initially appeared to have an ordinary case of bacterial pneumonia. However, he worked at American Media Inc. with Robert Stevens, the first person to die in the ongoing anthrax outbreak. "I said to myself, 'I don't think he has it, but if he does and I stop the antibiotics [for anthrax], he'll die. So I'm going to continue,' " recalled Omenaca, an infectious disease specialist at Miami's Cedars Medical Center. Richmond, Matcha's first anthrax case, looked surprisingly well when she first examined him, the physician recalled. But within a few hours, samples of his blood being cultured in the hospital's laboratory tested positive for the cigar-shaped anthrax bacteria. Matcha increased Richmond's dose of ciprofloxacin and added two other antibiotics, rifampin and clindamycin. Then she waited nervously for his condition to deteriorate, as the textbooks predicted it would. "They talk about how you have this flu-like syndrome for three or four days, get a little better, then crash," she said. "We weren't really sure where we were in this cycle. [But] he sort of stayed the same." Richmond's fever came down quickly. But fluid began to accumulate between the lungs and chest wall -- a complication medically known as pleural effusion. Meanwhile, on Sunday, Oct. 21, Matcha was called about a second postal worker, the man with the headache. Told that he worked at the Brentwood facility, she said: "Okay, let's get some blood cultures." The cultures soon were positive for the bacteria. "I don't know what made me think anthrax, to be perfectly honest," Matcha said. "Maybe it was just that I had been seeing the other patient." Omenaca, Blanco's doctor, didn't consider anthrax when he first examined Blanco in early October, on the patient's second day in the hospital. The mailroom clerk had been sick at home for a week with fever, a headache, a dry cough and mild confusion. A chest X-ray showed pneumonia but no enlarged lymph nodes. Omenaca started the man on two intravenous antibiotics. Two days later, Blanco's doctors learned that he worked with Stevens. Omenaca promptly substituted ciprofloxacin for one of Blanco's antibiotics. But even when a swab of Blanco's nose tested positive for anthrax spores, Omenaca said he doubted that anthrax was the cause of his illness. "I thought, 'This is a coincidental thing. He has pneumonia, and he's colonized with anthrax,' " Omenaca recalled. Omenaca and Blanco's other doctors consulted with federal health experts by telephone, sometimes as often as every two hours. Because Blanco had been on antibiotics for two days by the time anthrax was suspected, his blood cultures didn't show the bacteria. Doctors had to perform multiple tests -- on blood, lung fluid and a biopsy of the lung lining -- before they finally nailed down his diagnosis. "It was very stressful," Omenaca said. "If this was anthrax, it meant that somebody had put anthrax in that building. . . . Without the CDC, there's no way we could have made the diagnosis." Blanco's crash came on his sixth day at the hospital. He went into shock from the effects of the toxins produced by the bacteria. His blood pressure plunged, and he was admitted to the intensive care unit. Fluid accumulated around his lungs and had to be drained through a chest tube. Gradually, over a three-week period, he recovered. "I still don't know why he survived," Omenaca said. Omenaca said that, since treating Blanco, he has pored over old medical books trying to discover why the case differed from the classic picture of inhalational anthrax. In a 1901 text, he read that the disease sometimes shows up as pneumonia without large lymph nodes in the chest, just as Blanco's did. "I really look forward to having more insight on the other [recent] cases . . . to see what we can learn from those," he said. "And I hope that we are not able to do a large study." |
| October 30, 2001 Memo Raises Concern For Local Postal
Workers Workers Would Have To Prove Anthrax Exposure
Occurred On The Job:
WJXT News 4 Jax.com JACKSONVILLE
Eyewitness News obtained a memo Tuesday sent to
local postal workers earlier this month that said if they
contract anthrax they must prove that they were exposed
to it at the post office. U.S. Postmaster General John Potter said Tuesday that the Postal Service is doing everything possible to help employees. "For 18 days, we have been working to enhance the safety of our employees and their workplaces," Potter said. Some local postal workers said they wonder if that is true. Jim Piggott reported that the memo...was sent out earlier this month by the plant manager at the main post office on Kings Road. Piggott reported that the memo was only distributed to management but it addressed how the anthrax threat is being handled by the Jacksonville facility and how employees should react to it. The first part of the memo said, "We had a report of a clerk on the caller window asking customers if they wanted gloves to pick up the mail. This is not authorized and must be stopped. It was at the general mail facility in Jacksonville." "We are looking at the safety and well-being of employees and customers alike," post office spokesman Bill Tyler said. "We have issued gloves and masks for their protection. However, to be handing out gloves to the public, does that cross the line?" Another part of the memo involves the health of postal workers. It said, "If employees want to be tested for anthrax exposure, they must do it at their own expense. If they test positive (which is extremely unlikely), they have to prove they contracted it at work." Postal officials said that is the policy of the Department of Labor. "We lifted it right off the OWCP (Web) page. It reads, 'The Office of Workman's Compensation Programs will not pay a medical bill for an exam due to potential exposure,'" Tyler said. Postal workers who did not want to be identified told Piggott that they are concerned but could not comment further. Postal union officials also declined to comment. |
| October 29, 2001 Probes spread to 11 states: The Washington Times
Government officials fear other
anthrax-laced letters are "stuck in the
system," as mail-handling facilities in 11 states
were being checked yesterday. Investigators on Saturday
widened the scope of their search for the germ to 30 mail
facilities along the East Coast and in other parts of the
country amid fears that other tainted pieces of mail are
in circulation. These states include Virginia,
Maryland, North Carolina, Ohio, Kentucky, Pennsylvania,
Delaware, Illinois, Florida, Georgia, Arizona, New York
and New Jersey. The local facilities being tested are the Merrifield post office in Fairfax, the Gaithersburg post office and the Baltimore post office. Test results were still pending last night. |
| October 29, 2001 Anthrax Found in Mail Worker in New Jersey: The New York Times (Oct. 29) WASHINGTON, Oct. 28 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention confirmed the nation's eighth case of inhalation anthrax today, this time in a postal worker in New Jersey, bringing to 13 the total number of cases, both skin and pulmonary, identified since the attacks began this month. Andrew H. Card Jr., the White House chief of staff, said the deadly disease might be "stuck" on mail somewhere, contaminating machinery in postal facilities. |
Aired October 24, 2001 - 08:49 (ET) CNN LIVE AT DAYBREAK with Paula ZahnTOPIC: Anthrax Investigation:Should Post Office be Shut Down for Thorough Inspection?Postmaster General John Potter: "We have very defined incidents in four locations around the country. I don't believe that there is a need to shut down the Postal Service. You know, life is filled with risks, and, you know, you could die crossing the street, you can die driving a car, and that's not to minimize what is going on here, we did lose two of our own, but it is to suggest that you don't shut the Postal Service down. You know, if you think about it, how would you ever start it up?" |
| October 24, 2001 At Post Offices, Whispered Complaints About Latest Efforts to Protect Health: New York Times (Oct. 24, 2001) "...many workers and postal union leaders across the country, said today that the United States Postal Service's latest efforts to safeguard workers' health were still not enough, given the lethal possibilities that can arise from exposure to anthrax, which the authorities in Washington said caused the deaths of two postal workers on Monday." |
| October 23, 2001 Officials Admit Underestimating Danger Posed to Postal Workers: New York Times (Oct. 23, 2001) As more postal workers fell sick and two were confirmed dead from anthrax, federal officials dramatically stepped up their public health response today and acknowledged that they had underestimated the danger that anthrax-contaminated letters posed to those who carry and sort the mail. |
| October 22, 2001 U.S. Dept. of Labor Issues News Release About Anthrax Concerns: Secretary of Labor Elaine L. Chao issued a news release containing recommendations from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) that will reduce the risk of anthrax exposure when handling mail. |
The Office of Workers' Compensation Programs (OWCP) Policy Regarding Anthrax: The Office has received a number of inquiries regarding the workers' compensation coverage of Federal civilian employees who may have been exposed to anthrax. Generally, costs associated with preliminary testing to determine whether an employee may have experienced anthrax exposure would not be covered under workers' compensation. Services to screen for or prevent occupational diseases can be provided by the employing agency under the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 7901. The Office of Workers' Compensation Programs (OWCP) has no statutory authority to pay for routine screening or preventative services, because the Federal Employees' Compensation Act only provides for medical treatment of an actual injury or occupational disease. However, preventative care can be authorized by OWCP when there is probable exposure to a known contaminant, thereby requiring disease-specific measures against infection. When a Federal employee tests positive for anthrax exposure, and this exposure likely occurred in the workplace, a claim can be submitted to OWCP. The Office can authorize payment for the treatment rendered to prevent illness. Source: Office of Workers Compensation Programs Web site at: |
| U.S. Dept. of Labor Issues News Release About Anthrax Concerns: Secretary of Labor Elaine L. Chao issued a news release containing recommendations from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) that will reduce the risk of anthrax exposure when handling mail. |
| Prompt Response for Politicians, a Slower One for Postal Workers: New York Times (Oct. 22, 2001) by Sheryl Gay Stolberg "Even after two workers complained of being ill, postal officials said the chance that anyone at the center could be exposed was virtually nonexistent. But within several days, two postal workers one a mail carrier, the other a sorter tested positive for cutaneous anthrax, which can be cured by antibiotics. A third infection is considered likely, postal officials say." |
| 2 Postal Workers Have Inhalation Anthrax; 2 Deaths Under Investigation: New York Times (Oct. 22,2001) Two Washington-area postal workers have been diagnosed with inhalation anthrax and two more employees at the same facility have died of symptoms consistent with the disease, officials said Monday as the nation grappled with an unprecedented bioterrorism threat. |
| Anthrax Found on a 3rd Letter From Trenton: New York Times (Oct. 21, 2001) Investigators said yesterday that a letter discovered Friday night at the New York Post had tested positive for anthrax. |
| "It has now been clearly established that the U.S. mail has been used as a means of conveying anthrax to targeted individuals." (Oct. 19, 2001) The APWU and USPS Join to Discuss Health/Safety Issues Concerning the Use of U.S. Mail to Deliver Hazardous Material to Targeted Individuals: Burrus Update #55. |
| U.S. Postal Inspection Service, FBI offer reward of up to $1 million for information leading to arrest of anthrax mailers: (Oct. 18, 2001) The United States Postal Inspection Service and the Federal Bureau of Investigation jointly announced today that an award of up to $1 million is being offered for information leading to the arrest and conviction of those responsible for mailing letters containing anthrax such as those sent to Tom Brokaw at NBC and to U.S. Senator Tom Daschle. In partnership with America's Most Wanted, confidential telephone calls can be directed to the America's Most Wanted phone bank at 1-800 CRIME TV or to their Web site at www.amw.com. |
| ANTHRAXWhat To Do If You Find A Suspicious Letter, Parcel Or Package: (Oct. 17, 2001) The APWU Web site has posted some instructions for employees and supervision in case a suspect piece of mail (or equipment) is found. YOU SHOULD HAVE HAD A STAND-UP SAFETY TALK ABOUT THE UPDATED INSTRUCTIONS BY NOWIF NOT, DEMAND TO SEE YOUR UNION STEWARD. |
| APWU Safety Hotline Established On Anthrax: (Oct. 16, 2001) The National APWU has established a hotline for members to call for the latest Anthrax information. This number is 1-888-529-1029. |
last update: 11/03/01